FortWayne.com
 
  Text size  Increase text sizeDecrease text size      
Posted on Mon. Apr. 14, 2014 - 12:31 am EDT

Engineered fish spawn opposition

PHOTOS
 
Click on image to view.

WASHINGTON — Don’t expect to find genetically modified salmon – or any other engineered fish or meat – on store shelves anytime soon.

The Obama administration has stalled for more than four years on deciding whether to approve a fast-growing salmon that would be the first genetically modified animal approved for human consumption.

During that time, opponents of the technology have taken advantage of increasing consumer concern about genetically modified foods and have urged several major retailers not to sell it. So far, two of the nation’s biggest grocers, Safeway and Kroger, have pledged to keep the salmon off their shelves if it is approved.

Supporters of genetically engineered fish and meat say they expect Food and Drug Administration approval of the salmon and still hope to find a market for it. However, the retailers’ caution and lengthy regulatory delays have made investors skittish.

“The FDA delay has caused developers to take a pause,” says Dr. David Edwards of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, the main industry group for genetically engineered agriculture. “They’re not really sure where to go as far as the regulatory system.”

By altering genetic materials of animals, scientists have proposed – and in some cases actually created – animals that would be bred to be free of diseases, be cleaner in their environments or grow more efficiently. Think chickens bred to resist avian flu, “enviropigs” whose manure doesn’t pollute as much or cattle bred without horns so they don’t have to be taken off during slaughter.

But where the scientists see huge opportunity, critics see a food supply placed at risk. They say modified organisms can escape into the wild or mingle with native species, with unknown effects.

“These are fundamental questions we have to ask of society,” says Lisa Archer of Friends of the Earth, an advocacy group that has lobbied retailers not to sell the modified salmon and has urged people not to eat it.

There is no evidence that the foods would be unsafe, but for some, it is an ethical issue. Archer says people have a greater “visceral response” to eating modified fish and meat than they do engineered crops, which are already fully integrated into the food supply.

The FDA said in 2010 that the modified salmon appears to be safe to eat, and said in 2012 that it is unlikely to harm the environment. But an FDA spokeswoman said “it is not possible to predict a timeline for when a decision will be made.”


Wednesday
Wednesday
High  °F
Low  °F
41 °F
A Few Clouds
Sponsored by Masters Heating & Cooling, Inc.
LOCAL BUSINESS SEARCH
Local Search
STOCK SUMMARY
Dow 16461.32-153.49
Nasdaq 4382.85-36.63
S&P 500 1927.11-14.17
AEP 55.92+0.36
Comcast 51.49-0.70
GE 25.19-0.26
ITT Exelis 16.44-0.03
LNC 49.16-0.61
Navistar 33.06-0.74
Raytheon 97.45-0.66
SDI 22.26+0.36
Verizon 48.31-0.38
  Stock Sponsor